← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jarrid Privitera Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.2122 0.2247 0.9988 1.0576
2012-13 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 15 11 26 0.464 0.2957 0.2974 1.3914 1.3993
2013-14 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 58 10 25 35 0.603 0.3842 0.3684 1.8082 1.7338
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 35 3 9 12 0.343
2016-17 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 34 8 11 19 0.559
2015-16 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 40 10 8 18 0.450
2014-15 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 30 6 4 10 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2014-15 · Vermont
+14.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7578
Forward overall
#306
Forward born in 1994
#1218
in USHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.