IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Berger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Janesville Jets NAHL 11 1 0 1 0.091 0.0334 0.0349 0.0959 0.1001
2010-11 — NAHL 38 7 4 11 0.289 0.1064 0.1057 0.3056 0.3035
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 19 14 33 1.222
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA JR 26 6 10 16 0.615
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA SO 26 8 11 19 0.731
2011-12 Marian D3 NCHA FR 26 17 10 27 1.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2011-12 · Marian
+1468.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#50405
Forward overall
#1833
Forward born in 1991
#5770
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dom Kuziak
Castleton · 2015-16
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Anderson
Arcadia · 2023-24
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Puddifant
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.