IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garret Clemment Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 53 9 16 25 0.472 0.1751 0.1826 0.4994 0.5208
2012-13 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 59 28 27 55 0.932 0.3461 0.3435 0.9870 0.9797
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 22 14 9 23 1.046
2015-16 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 27 10 18 28 1.037
2014-15 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 31 3 4 7 0.226
2013-14 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 35 3 12 15 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2013-14 · Lake Superior State
+79.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12322
Forward overall
#453
Forward born in 1993
#716
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Mayer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Omar Mullan
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
1.286 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Soik
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2005-06
1.346 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.