IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Irwin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 55 13 8 21 0.382 0.2431 0.2569 1.1441 1.2090
2011-12 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 28 8 6 14 0.500 0.3184 0.3216 1.4984 1.5133
2012-13 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 21 14 35 0.565 0.3595 0.3440 1.6916 1.6184
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 57 18 13 31 0.544 0.3464 0.3152 1.6299 1.4832
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 11 0 4 4 0.364
2015-16 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 30 1 9 10 0.333
2014-15 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 30 8 6 14 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2014-15 · Vermont
+66.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7768
Forward overall
#292
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bradley Somers
Adrian · 2021-22
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Dill
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Tucker
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.