IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Irwin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 55 13 8 21 0.382 0.2252 0.2380 1.1467 1.2117
2011-12 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 28 8 6 14 0.500 0.2949 0.2978 1.5017 1.5167
2012-13 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 21 14 35 0.565 0.3330 0.3186 1.6954 1.6221
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 57 18 13 31 0.544 0.3208 0.2919 1.6335 1.4865
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 11 0 4 4 0.364
2015-16 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 30 1 9 10 0.333
2014-15 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 30 8 6 14 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2014-15 · Vermont
+80.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13427
Forward overall
#496
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Van Natter
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Somers
Adrian · 2021-22
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Weber
Post · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.