IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jay Dickman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Fargo Force USHL 12 0 5 5 0.417 0.2654 0.2667 1.2487 1.2550
2012-13 Austin Bruins NAHL 55 23 32 55 1.000 0.3713 0.3678 1.0588 1.0488
2013-14 Austin Bruins NAHL 59 28 36 64 1.085 0.4027 0.3787 1.1485 1.0800
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 38 6 10 16 0.421
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 37 15 8 23 0.622
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SO 39 6 7 13 0.333
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 18 3 0 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2015-16 · Bemidji State
-48.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6960
Forward overall
#264
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Stewart
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Rein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.967 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikita Kozyrev
Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.