← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Bellant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Flint Jr. Generals NA3HL 28 4 5 9 0.321 0.0355 0.0401 0.1018 0.1151
2015-16 NAHL 53 13 18 31 0.585 0.2078 0.2171 0.6141 0.6417
2016-17 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 56 27 28 55 0.982 0.3488 0.3455 1.0311 1.0214
2017-18 NAHL 56 16 25 41 0.732 0.2600 0.2447 0.7686 0.7234
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Adrian D1 JR 23 14 13 27 1.174
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA 23 14 13 27 1.174
2019-20 Adrian D1 SO 26 17 21 38 1.462
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA 26 17 21 38 1.462
2018-19 Michigan Tech D1 WCHA FR 13 2 2 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2018-19 · Michigan Tech
+26.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14883
Forward overall
#655
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.