← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonny Mulera Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 48 14 22 36 0.750 0.1733 0.1794 0.6064 0.6276
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 49 27 27 54 1.102 0.2547 0.2491 0.8911 0.8714
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 49 34 40 74 1.510 0.3490 0.3490 1.2211 1.2211
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC 29 16 12 28 0.966
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE 28 12 19 31 1.107
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE 22 13 18 31 1.409
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast 20 0 4 4 0.200
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast 9 0 4 4 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2020-21 · Maine
+134.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
30%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3168
Forward overall
#129
Forward born in 1999
#9
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2007-08
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.