← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonny Mulera Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 48 14 22 36 0.750 0.3058 0.3165 0.6028 0.6239
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 49 27 27 54 1.102 0.4493 0.4394 0.8858 0.8662
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 49 34 40 74 1.510 0.6157 0.6157 1.2139 1.2139
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC 29 16 12 28 0.966
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE 28 12 19 31 1.107
2022-23 Salve Regina D3 CNE 22 13 18 31 1.409
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast 20 0 4 4 0.200
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast 9 0 4 4 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2020-21 · Maine
+33.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2742
Forward overall
#106
Forward born in 1999
#9
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2007-08
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2012-13
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.