Phil Marinaccio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-14 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2009-10	Vaughan Vipers	OJHL	8	4	1	5	0.625	0.1532	0.1687	0.4303	0.4739
2010-11	Villanova Knights	OJHL	29	12	7	19	0.655	0.1606	0.1694	0.4511	0.4758
2011-12	Chicago Steel	USHL	44	10	28	38	0.864	0.5094	0.5085	2.5937	2.5891
2012-13	—	USHL	62	20	28	48	0.774	0.4567	0.4316	2.3252	2.1973
2023-24	Västerviks IK	Allsvenskan	15	2	2	4	0.267	0.6667	0.5030	2.5022	1.8878

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2016-17	Bemidji State	D1	WCHA	SR	41	11	18	29	0.707
2015-16	Bemidji State	D1	WCHA	JR	36	2	7	9	0.250
2014-15	Bemidji State	D1	WCHA	JR	34	1	8	9	0.265
2013-14	Bemidji State	D1	WCHA	FR	36	5	6	11	0.306

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.40

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.31

2013-14 · Bemidji State

-22.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

95%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4372

Forward overall

#211

Forward born in 1993

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Melso

SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19

0.750 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Tim Coffman

Utica · 2023-24

1.480 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Rick Cleaver

Norwich · 2003-04

1.235 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.