| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | EC Bad Nauheim | DEL2 | 52 | 22 | 31 | 53 | 1.019 | 1.3653 | 0.7930 | — | — |
| 2023-24 | EC Bad Nauheim | DEL2 | 52 | 25 | 33 | 58 | 1.115 | 1.4942 | 0.8258 | — | — |
| 2024-25 | EC Bad Nauheim | DEL2 | 33 | 11 | 20 | 31 | 0.939 | 1.2584 | 0.6311 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Utica | D3 | — | SR | 22 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 1.500 |
| 2010-11 | Utica | D3 | — | JR | 25 | 11 | 23 | 34 | 1.360 |
| 2009-10 | Utica | D3 | — | SO | 26 | 19 | 16 | 35 | 1.346 |
| 2008-09 | Utica | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 17 | 20 | 37 | 1.480 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.