IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Shuart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — USHL 13 1 0 1 0.077 0.0490 0.0541 0.2304 0.2546
2011-12 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 56 9 12 21 0.375 0.2388 0.2527 1.1238 1.1893
2012-13 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 35 8 7 15 0.429 0.2729 0.2743 1.2844 1.2910
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 32 3 9 12 0.375
2015-16 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 38 6 9 15 0.395
2014-15 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 35 3 10 13 0.371
2013-14 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13911
Forward overall
#579
Forward born in 1994
#2114
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Gylling
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Busby
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2004-05
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Arias
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.