← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikolas Olsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 NTDP-U18 24 1 4 5 0.208 0.1548 0.1602 0.7773 0.8043
2011-12 NTDP-U18 47 5 1 6 0.128 0.0949 0.0933 0.4765 0.4686
2012-13 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 41 10 6 16 0.390 0.2302 0.2310 1.1719 1.1758
2013-14 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 34 3 4 7 0.206 0.1215 0.1162 0.6184 0.5915
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 30 0 3 3 0.100
2016-17 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 17 3 3 6 0.353
2015-16 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 14 0 4 4 0.286
2014-15 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 31 6 5 11 0.355
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2014-15 · Boston University
+155.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37090
Forward overall
#1457
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.