IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Johanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — NA3HL 34 21 17 38 1.118 0.1403 0.1448 0.3528 0.3641
2015-16 Atlanta Capitals NA3HL 44 44 28 72 1.636 0.2054 0.2020 0.5166 0.5080
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Trine D1 NCHA SO 24 4 8 12 0.500
2018-19 Trine D3 NCHA — 24 4 8 12 0.500
2017-18 Trine D3 NCHA — 22 1 7 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2017-18 · Trine
+137.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13794
Forward overall
#552
Forward born in 1996
#172
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Pelton
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Fryfogle
Canton · 2022-23
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Quatieri
Connecticut College · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.