← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Pelton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHLP 42 26 42 68 1.619 0.1266 0.1279 0.3656 0.3694
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 46 18 20 38 0.826 0.1773 0.1790 0.4045 0.4084
2017-18 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 50 18 20 38 0.760 0.1631 0.1556 0.3722 0.3551
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 3 3 0 3 1.000
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 28 5 9 14 0.500
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 26 7 9 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2018-19 · UMass Dartmouth
+335.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26104
Forward overall
#1132
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.