← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-07-03 Country: Australia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 45 6 5 11 0.244 0.0951 0.1068 0.3564 0.4002
2001-02 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 50 5 8 13 0.260 0.1012 0.1081 0.3792 0.4049
2002-03 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 56 8 20 28 0.500 0.1946 0.1994 0.7291 0.7470
2003-04 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 50 16 13 29 0.580 0.2257 0.2212 0.8458 0.8289
2004-05 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 56 19 24 43 0.768 0.2989 0.2790 1.1198 1.0452
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 SR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 JR 22 0 4 4 0.182
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 SO 28 6 11 17 0.607
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 FR 26 6 6 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2005-06 · St. Scholastica
+110.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14406
Forward overall
#490
Forward born in 1984
#1239
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.