← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Joy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Cornwall Colts CCHL 52 10 8 18 0.346 0.0751 0.0752 0.2679 0.2681
2001-02 Cornwall Colts CCHL 55 42 33 75 1.364 0.2958 0.2823 1.0550 1.0067
2002-03 Cornwall Colts CCHL 21 9 14 23 1.095 0.2375 0.2157 0.8474 0.7697
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 27 6 14 20 0.741
2005-06 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 28 14 19 33 1.179
2004-05 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 26 4 5 9 0.346
2003-04 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 29 10 18 28 0.966
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2003-04 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+365.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14145
Forward overall
#459
Forward born in 1982
#166
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2023-24
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.