IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Joy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Cornwall Colts CCHL 52 10 8 18 0.346 0.0988 0.0989 0.2680 0.2682
2001-02 Cornwall Colts CCHL 55 42 33 75 1.364 0.3892 0.3714 1.0556 1.0072
2002-03 Cornwall Colts CCHL 21 9 14 23 1.095 0.3126 0.2839 0.8478 0.7700
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Elmira D3 — SR 27 6 14 20 0.741
2005-06 Elmira D3 — JR 28 14 19 33 1.179
2004-05 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 26 4 5 9 0.346
2003-04 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 29 10 18 28 0.966
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2003-04 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+253.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11360
Forward overall
#418
Forward born in 1982
#207
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ty Kraus
Northland · 2015-16
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Shand
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vince Perreault
Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.