← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Shand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 14 1 5 6 0.429 0.2528 0.2560 1.2873 1.3036
2014-15 NAHL 42 7 7 14 0.333 0.1225 0.1220 0.3518 0.3502
2015-16 Metro Jets NA3HL 43 41 40 81 1.884 0.2364 0.2220 0.5947 0.5585
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA SR 12 3 4 7 0.583
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 12 3 4 7 0.583
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 NCHA JR 15 2 2 4 0.267
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 15 2 2 4 0.267
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 17 2 5 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2016-17 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+164.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16146
Forward overall
#614
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2017-18
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2023-24
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.