IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincenzo Renda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Brockville Braves CCHL 60 3 39 42 0.700 0.1518 0.1483 0.5416 0.5290
2016-17 Brooks Bandits AJHL 25 1 11 12 0.480 0.1610 0.1495 0.4442 0.4124
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D1 CNE SR 26 2 13 15 0.577
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 26 2 13 15 0.577
2018-19 Salve Regina D1 CNE JR 26 5 20 25 0.962
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 26 5 20 25 0.962
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 30 2 20 22 0.733
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2017-18 · Salve Regina
+421.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7219
Defenseman overall
#1219
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Kostelecky
Bethel · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jody Sullivan
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Sampson
Aurora · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.