IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincenzo Renda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Brockville Braves CCHL 60 3 39 42 0.700 0.1998 0.1952 0.5419 0.5293
2016-17 Brooks Bandits AJHL 25 1 11 12 0.480 0.1603 0.1488 0.4456 0.4137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 26 2 13 15 0.577
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 26 5 20 25 0.962
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 30 2 20 22 0.733
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2017-18 · Salve Regina
+364.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5036
Defenseman overall
#945
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jody Sullivan
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Christensen
St. Norbert · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Sampson
Aurora · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.