IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Arentz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Fargo Force USHL 55 4 4 8 0.145 0.0858 0.0948 0.4370 0.4830
2011-12 Fargo Force USHL 54 10 12 22 0.407 0.2403 0.2544 1.2236 1.2953
2012-13 Fargo Force USHL 39 8 8 16 0.410 0.2420 0.2433 1.2323 1.2389
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 WCHA SR 41 7 7 14 0.342
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 WCHA JR 38 4 7 11 0.289
2014-15 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 38 9 11 20 0.526
2013-14 Bemidji State D1 WCHA FR 23 3 5 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2013-14 · Bemidji State
+64.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26232
Forward overall
#1014
Forward born in 1994
#2529
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vadim Kiryakov
Buffalo State · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jaden Davis
Aurora · 2022-23
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.