IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Aquaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Revolution EHLP 37 33 34 67 1.811 0.2077 0.2291 0.4082 0.4503
2018-19 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 48 7 14 21 0.438 0.1607 0.1693 0.4618 0.4865
2019-20 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 16 19 35 0.686 0.2521 0.2521 0.7244 0.7244
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 44 16 35 51 1.159 0.4726 0.4726 0.9317 0.9317
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 31 16 18 34 1.097
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 27 17 12 29 1.074
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 27 21 18 39 1.444
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 26 16 16 32 1.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.23
2021-22 · Hobart
+644.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7271
Forward overall
#309
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Whelan
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curtis Carlson
Nichols · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.