IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Aquaro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Revolution EHLP 37 33 34 67 1.811 0.1416 0.1562 0.4089 0.4511
2018-19 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 48 7 14 21 0.438 0.1624 0.1711 0.4632 0.4880
2019-20 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 16 19 35 0.686 0.2548 0.2548 0.7267 0.7267
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 44 16 35 51 1.159 0.3266 0.3266 0.9384 0.9384
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 31 16 18 34 1.097
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 27 17 12 29 1.074
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 27 21 18 39 1.444
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 26 16 16 32 1.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.23
2021-22 · Hobart
+770.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13119
Forward overall
#355
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Kyle Haak
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Vosejpka
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Air Force (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Maloney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Heller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jacob Hetz
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curtis Carlson
Nichols · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Hogan
Utica · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.