← New Search ↗ Social Card

Curtis Carlson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Southern Tier Xpress NA3HL 35 5 14 19 0.543 0.0654 0.0711 0.1715 0.1863
2015-16 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 58 16 22 38 0.655 0.2433 0.2422 0.6937 0.6906
2017-18 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 59 20 19 39 0.661 0.2454 0.2322 0.6999 0.6622
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Nichols D3 CNE SR 23 10 13 23 1.000
2020-21 Nichols D3 CNE JR 4 3 3 6 1.500
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE SO 27 12 12 24 0.889
2018-19 Nichols D3 CNE FR 25 8 6 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2018-19 · Nichols
+177.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
45%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18640
Forward overall
#767
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2004-05
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.