IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gage Torrel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 53 12 16 28 0.528 0.1962 0.2145 0.5594 0.6116
2012-13 Fargo Force USHL 59 7 11 18 0.305 0.1943 0.1952 0.9143 0.9183
2013-14 Fargo Force USHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0796 0.0762 0.3746 0.3587
2014-15 Langley Rivermen BCHL 54 26 38 64 1.185 0.4613 0.4316 1.7284 1.6172
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SR 38 7 18 25 0.658
2017-18 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA JR 36 5 11 16 0.444
2016-17 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 36 14 8 22 0.611
2015-16 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 38 8 11 19 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2015-16 · Lake Superior State
+101.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7020
Forward overall
#285
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Cole
Trinity · 2012-13
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Marra
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.