← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colton Friesen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Winkler Flyers MJHL 57 12 14 26 0.456 0.0878 0.0971 0.2876 0.3179
2019-20 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 50 11 26 37 0.740 0.3017 0.3017 0.5948 0.5948
2020-21 NCDC 32 7 16 23 0.719 0.2931 0.2931 0.5778 0.5778
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 60 11 25 36 0.600 0.2204 0.2145 0.6333 0.6164
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA SR 37 12 15 27 0.730
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA 32 7 10 17 0.531
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA 24 3 8 11 0.458
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 29 11 11 22 0.759
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Superior
+429.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11982
Forward overall
#552
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2018-19
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2006-07
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.