IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Richard Manley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-12-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 29 2 3 5 0.172 0.1371 0.1447 0.6457 0.6815
2006-07 Chicago Steel USHL 19 6 3 9 0.474 0.3017 0.3288 1.4195 1.5471
2007-08 Coquitlam Express BCHL 58 16 35 51 0.879 0.3422 0.3591 1.2823 1.3455
2008-09 Lincoln Stars USHL 28 5 10 15 0.536 0.3411 0.3390 1.6053 1.5955
2009-10 Coquitlam Express BCHL 54 20 29 49 0.907 0.3532 0.3365 1.3233 1.2607
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 12 1 9 10 0.833
2011-12 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 18 4 7 11 0.611
2010-11 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 20 11 12 23 1.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2010-11 · SUNY Geneseo
+298.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8337
Forward overall
#337
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Redick
Plymouth State · 2021-22
1.476 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Schremp
Elmira · 2003-04
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bossert
Concordia · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.