| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | U.S. National U17 Team | NTDP-U18 | 29 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.172 | 0.1281 | 0.1352 | 0.6433 | 0.6789 |
| 2006-07 | Chicago Steel | USHL | 19 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0.474 | 0.2794 | 0.3045 | 1.4227 | 1.5505 |
| 2007-08 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 58 | 16 | 35 | 51 | 0.879 | 0.3388 | 0.3555 | 1.2796 | 1.3426 |
| 2008-09 | Lincoln Stars | USHL | 28 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.536 | 0.3160 | 0.3141 | 1.6089 | 1.5991 |
| 2009-10 | Coquitlam Express | BCHL | 54 | 20 | 29 | 49 | 0.907 | 0.3496 | 0.3331 | 1.3205 | 1.2581 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | SUNY Geneseo | D3 | SUNYAC | JR | 12 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0.833 |
| 2011-12 | SUNY Geneseo | D3 | SUNYAC | SO | 18 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.611 |
| 2010-11 | SUNY Geneseo | D3 | SUNYAC | FR | 20 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 1.150 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.