IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Bossert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 54 6 15 21 0.389 0.1444 0.1462 0.4118 0.4169
2016-17 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 57 24 24 48 0.842 0.3127 0.2996 0.8916 0.8542
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 26 10 23 33 1.269
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 2 0 1 1 0.500
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 6 21 27 1.038
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 26 11 28 39 1.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.50
2018-19 · Concordia
+635.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15277
Forward overall
#613
Forward born in 1996
#1121
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Fritz
Saint John's · 2014-15
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Frost
Nazareth · 2021-22
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.