← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Redick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Markham Royals OJHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0466 0.0511 0.1150 0.1260
2019-20 Collingwood Blues OJHL 25 4 9 13 0.520 0.1453 0.1453 0.3589 0.3589
2020-21 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 7 1 7 8 1.143 0.1538 0.1538 0.3890 0.3890
2021-22 Collingwood Blues OJHL 54 20 26 46 0.852 0.2380 0.2261 0.5879 0.5586
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 27 17 17 34 1.259
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 22 17 17 34 1.546
2023-24 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 27 27 31 58 2.148
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 21 11 20 31 1.476
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.48
2022-23 · Plymouth State
+1004.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20254
Forward overall
#714
Forward born in 2001
#1512
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2008-09
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.