← New Search ↗ Social Card

Billy Vizzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 49 16 19 35 0.714 0.2005 0.2066 0.5883 0.6063
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 26 34 60 1.395 0.3917 0.3845 1.1492 1.1281
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Curry D1 SR 26 15 16 31 1.192
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE 26 15 16 31 1.192
2018-19 Curry D1 JR 14 12 14 26 1.857
2018-19 Curry D3 14 12 14 26 1.857
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 American International D1 AHA 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2016-17 · American International
-53.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14471
Forward overall
#578
Forward born in 1995
#16
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2013-14
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.