IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Olsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — USHL 43 6 13 19 0.442 0.2814 0.2885 1.3242 1.3578
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 13 1 3 4 0.308 0.1959 0.1917 0.9221 0.9024
2014-15 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 50 13 28 41 0.820 0.2462 0.2416 0.6754 0.6628
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE SR 21 10 21 31 1.476
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE JR 26 16 22 38 1.462
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE SO 25 17 18 35 1.400
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE FR 22 12 18 30 1.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.36
2015-16 · Endicott
+618.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18952
Forward overall
#776
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Haeg
St. John's · 2010-11
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Penner
Concordia Wisconsin · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Kearney
Suffolk · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.