IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jax Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Elk River/Zimmerman High USHS-MN 25 15 22 37 1.480 0.3984 0.4144 0.3595 0.3740
2015-16 Madison Capitols USHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.6368 0.6926 2.9967 3.2592
2017-18 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 48 13 27 40 0.833 0.3094 0.3150 — —
2018-19 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 20 23 43 0.754 0.2801 0.2726 0.7988 0.7775
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC — 10 1 3 4 0.400
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC — 21 5 9 14 0.667
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC — 24 9 12 21 0.875
2020-21 Arizona State D1 — SO 22 5 5 10 0.455
2019-20 Arizona State D1 — FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9383
Forward overall
#308
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2003-04
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Kemp
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2000-01
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Hagaman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.