IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Haeg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Owatonna Express NAHL 52 3 11 14 0.269 0.1000 0.1015 0.2850 0.2893
2010-11 Owatonna Express NAHL 58 17 17 34 0.586 0.2177 0.2099 0.6207 0.5985
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Saint John's D3 — SR 25 8 12 20 0.800
2013-14 Saint John's D3 — JR 26 8 16 24 0.923
2012-13 St. John's D3 — SO 28 11 19 30 1.071
2011-12 St. John's D3 — FR 24 7 20 27 1.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.12
2011-12 · St. John's
+688.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24495
Forward overall
#1021
Forward born in 1990
#2642
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Stewart
Marian · 2013-14
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bradley Tierney
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2008-09
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Dill
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.