← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Vassos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-12-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Toronto Thunderbirds OJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0490 0.0580 0.1377 0.1631
2006-07 Orangeville Crushers OJHL 47 15 15 30 0.638 0.1564 0.1774 0.4395 0.4986
2007-08 Orangeville Crushers OJHL 49 17 36 53 1.082 0.2651 0.2888 0.7447 0.8111
2008-09 Orangeville Crushers OJHL 13 8 10 18 1.385 0.3394 0.3523 0.9533 0.9895
2009-10 Orangeville Crushers OJHL 47 19 38 57 1.213 0.2973 0.2930 0.8350 0.8228
2010-11 Caledon Admirals OJHL 36 17 26 43 1.194 0.2927 0.2748 0.8223 0.7720
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Hamilton D3 NESCAC 23 2 5 7 0.304
2013-14 Hamilton D3 NESCAC 14 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Hamilton D3 NESCAC 16 2 3 5 0.312
2011-12 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC 2 0 1 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2011-12 · Bowdoin
+107.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10721
Forward overall
#448
Forward born in 1990
#194
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2003-04
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.