| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Toronto Thunderbirds | OJHL | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.200 | 0.0490 | 0.0580 | 0.1377 | 0.1631 |
| 2006-07 | Orangeville Crushers | OJHL | 47 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 0.638 | 0.1564 | 0.1774 | 0.4395 | 0.4986 |
| 2007-08 | Orangeville Crushers | OJHL | 49 | 17 | 36 | 53 | 1.082 | 0.2651 | 0.2888 | 0.7447 | 0.8111 |
| 2008-09 | Orangeville Crushers | OJHL | 13 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 1.385 | 0.3394 | 0.3523 | 0.9533 | 0.9895 |
| 2009-10 | Orangeville Crushers | OJHL | 47 | 19 | 38 | 57 | 1.213 | 0.2973 | 0.2930 | 0.8350 | 0.8228 |
| 2010-11 | Caledon Admirals | OJHL | 36 | 17 | 26 | 43 | 1.194 | 0.2927 | 0.2748 | 0.8223 | 0.7720 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Hamilton | D3 | NESCAC | — | 23 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.304 |
| 2013-14 | Hamilton | D3 | NESCAC | — | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2012-13 | Hamilton | D3 | NESCAC | — | 16 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.312 |
| 2011-12 | Bowdoin | D3 | NESCAC | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.