IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Stewart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 35 3 5 8 0.229 0.0764 0.0804 0.2122 0.2233
2012-13 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 36 14 13 27 0.750 0.2919 0.2920 1.0937 1.0940
2013-14 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 58 12 35 47 0.810 0.3154 0.3009 1.1817 1.1275
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA SR 29 12 24 36 1.241
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA JR 26 6 15 21 0.808
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA SO 26 3 28 31 1.192
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 7 13 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2014-15 · Marian
+191.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7828
Forward overall
#296
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Malkmus
Finlandia · 2013-14
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Olsson
Endicott · 2014-15
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Norman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.