IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Scurfield Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Soo Eagles NOJHL 41 20 20 40 0.976 0.1661 0.1580 0.4135 0.3933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 27 12 13 25 0.926
2011-12 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 28 13 19 32 1.143
2010-11 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 20 8 9 17 0.850
2009-10 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 21 7 5 12 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2009-10 · Lawrence
+322.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23761
Forward overall
#820
Forward born in 1988
#172
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joshua Larson
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Philippe Longchamps
Western New England · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Ledbetter
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.