IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Tremblay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 42 17 32 49 1.167 0.1316 0.1337 0.3969 0.4032
2023-24 Northern Cyclones USPHL-Premier 44 20 48 68 1.546 0.1743 0.1686 0.5258 0.5087
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 32 7 16 23 0.719
2024-25 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 — 12 2 1 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2024-25 · Saint Anselm
+88.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
12%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6603
Forward overall
#232
Forward born in 2003
#216
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Bagnole
SUNY Geneseo · 2024-25
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Hansen
St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Cuthrell
Nichols · 2013-14
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.