| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Olds Grizzlys | AJHL | 58 | 11 | 18 | 29 | 0.500 | 0.1670 | 0.1760 | 0.4642 | 0.4893 |
| 2011-12 | Olds Grizzlys | AJHL | 57 | 12 | 22 | 34 | 0.597 | 0.1992 | 0.1999 | 0.5537 | 0.5556 |
| 2012-13 | Olds Grizzlys | AJHL | 51 | 11 | 24 | 35 | 0.686 | 0.2292 | 0.2182 | 0.6371 | 0.6066 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Castleton | D3 | LittleEast | SR | 27 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 0.630 |
| 2015-16 | Castleton | D3 | LittleEast | JR | 25 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0.480 |
| 2014-15 | Castleton | D3 | LittleEast | SO | 26 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.308 |
| 2013-14 | Castleton | D3 | LittleEast | FR | 25 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.560 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.