IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marc Harrie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-12-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 17 2 5 7 0.412 0.1529 0.1541 0.4360 0.4394
2007-08 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 58 21 23 44 0.759 0.2817 0.2700 0.8032 0.7699
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 24 4 2 6 0.250
2010-11 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 27 5 5 10 0.370
2009-10 Concordia D3 — SO 25 7 9 16 0.640
2008-09 Concordia D3 — FR 25 9 11 20 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2008-09 · Concordia
+318.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16814
Forward overall
#678
Forward born in 1987
#1370
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vincent Dekumbis
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2003-04
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Stachowiak
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.