IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryan Ross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 — BCHL 42 6 9 15 0.357 0.1376 0.1385 0.5197 0.5232
2007-08 — NAHL 9 3 5 8 0.889 0.3266 0.3142 0.9382 0.9026
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 26 11 28 39 1.500
2010-11 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 28 15 31 46 1.643
2009-10 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 25 18 19 37 1.480
2008-09 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 24 9 6 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2008-09 · Fredonia
+199.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40091
Forward overall
#1339
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Bergeman
University of New England · 2022-23
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Oliver De Croock
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Boyd
Adrian · 2014-15
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.