IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Bergeman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 40 13 13 26 0.650 0.1502 0.1545 0.5256 0.5405
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 50 25 33 58 1.160 0.2681 0.2645 0.9380 0.9254
2023-24 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 48 35 25 60 1.250 0.2889 0.2686 1.0108 0.9399
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England D3 — — 28 5 12 17 0.607
2024-25 New England D3 — — 23 8 10 18 0.783
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2024-25 · New England
+242.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3828
Forward overall
#94
Forward born in 2003
#16
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Verbeke
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.