IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Zaleski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 12 2 4 6 0.500 0.0656 0.0663 0.1698 0.1717
2018-19 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 14 4 7 11 0.786 0.1338 0.1271 0.3330 0.3163
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2021-22 King's D3 MAC — 18 1 4 5 0.278
2020-21 Becker D3 — SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Becker D3 — FR 21 2 8 10 0.476
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2019-20 · Becker
+441.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29607
Forward overall
#1469
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Daniel Litchke
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Techel
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Jewett
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.