IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Markell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-11-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Cornwall Colts CCHL 21 3 9 12 0.571 0.1239 0.1224 0.4421 0.4368
2006-07 Trenton Sting OJHL 47 18 20 38 0.808 0.1982 0.1842 0.5567 0.5173
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 24 5 4 9 0.375
2010-11 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 25 5 4 9 0.360
2009-10 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 23 4 5 9 0.391
2008-09 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 24 8 11 19 0.792
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2008-09 · SUNY Cortland
+480.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33374
Forward overall
#1092
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Ford
Elmira · 2015-16
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Routh
St. Michael's College · 2018-19
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Luedtke
Concordia · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.