IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor McBride Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Janesville Jets NAHL 55 26 18 44 0.800 0.2939 0.2967 0.8444 0.8525
2011-12 Janesville Jets NAHL 58 22 26 48 0.828 0.3041 0.2920 0.8735 0.8388
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 25 13 7 20 0.800
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 25 6 3 9 0.360
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 28 7 10 17 0.607
2012-13 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 25 5 9 14 0.560
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2012-13 · St. Thomas
+122.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13672
Forward overall
#524
Forward born in 1991
#556
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Mikulan
Aurora · 2011-12
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy York
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Valadao
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.