IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Juron Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 29 4 1 5 0.172 0.0518 0.0535 0.1420 0.1468
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 32 4 6 10 0.312 0.0938 0.0924 0.2574 0.2535
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 17 2 1 3 0.176
2017-18 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 22 5 3 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2017-18 · SUNY Potsdam
+452.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44336
Forward overall
#2053
Forward born in 1996
#269
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Sorensen
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Prost
Western New England · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Collins
Becker · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.