IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Bondra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-12-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 50 8 15 23 0.460 0.1291 0.1402 0.3782 0.4108
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 54 8 23 31 0.574 0.1407 0.1390 0.3953 0.3906
2016-17 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 30 17 20 37 1.233 0.3462 0.3422 1.0140 1.0023
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 7 2 3 5 0.714
2019-20 Amherst D3 NESCAC GR 25 3 13 16 0.640
2018-19 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 26 5 11 16 0.615
2017-18 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 23 5 8 13 0.565
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2017-18 · Amherst
+153.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22519
Forward overall
#899
Forward born in 1996
#50
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Romero
Westfield State · 2008-09
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Flanagan
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brent Wold
Utica · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.