IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Panchisin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — NAHL 13 1 1 2 0.154 0.0565 0.0565 0.1623 0.1623
2021-22 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 23 2 5 7 0.304 0.1118 0.1127 0.3212 0.3239
2022-23 Boston Advantage NCDC 49 26 35 61 1.245 0.5075 0.4887 1.0007 0.9637
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 25 7 16 23 0.920
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 28 11 19 30 1.071
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 26 11 19 30 1.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2023-24 · SUNY Geneseo
+298.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8018
Forward overall
#372
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Culhane
Neumann · 2023-24
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.