IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Panchisin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — NAHL 13 1 1 2 0.154 0.0571 0.0571 0.1628 0.1628
2021-22 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 23 2 5 7 0.304 0.1130 0.1140 0.3222 0.3249
2022-23 Boston Advantage NCDC 49 26 35 61 1.245 0.3508 0.3378 1.0079 0.9706
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 25 7 16 23 0.920
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 28 11 19 30 1.071
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 26 11 19 30 1.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2023-24 · SUNY Geneseo
+443.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18308
Forward overall
#673
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Gibson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.