IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frédérick Allaire Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Brockville Braves CCHL 62 9 12 21 0.339 0.0967 0.0951 0.2622 0.2578
2018-19 Brockville Braves CCHL 59 25 15 40 0.678 0.1935 0.1817 0.5248 0.4927
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 25 8 8 16 0.640
2021-22 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 22 5 9 14 0.636
2020-21 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 26 5 5 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · Hamilton
+205.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27045
Forward overall
#1133
Forward born in 1998
#912
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Horan
Williams · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Hogg
Concordia Wisconsin · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Beauvais
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.