IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Waring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-08-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 25 4 6 10 0.400 0.1123 0.1147 0.3289 0.3358
2016-17 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 54 8 29 37 0.685 0.2517 0.2395 0.7232 0.6882
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Augsburg D1 MIAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Augsburg D1 MIAC JR 13 2 1 3 0.231
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 13 2 1 3 0.231
2018-19 Endicott D1 CNE SO 14 1 9 10 0.714
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE — 14 1 9 10 0.714
2017-18 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6384
Defenseman overall
#1119
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Rufa
Southern New Hampshire · 2024-25
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Geric Brodt
Wentworth · 2006-07
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Porrier
Johnson & Wales · 2010-11
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.