← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Waltman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 49 10 18 28 0.571 0.2122 0.2122 0.6050 0.6050
2020-21 Chippewa Steel NAHL 48 11 11 22 0.458 0.1702 0.1702 0.4852 0.4852
2021-22 NAHL 57 13 28 41 0.719 0.2671 0.2560 0.7616 0.7299
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 26 4 8 12 0.462
2024-25 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 26 7 10 17 0.654
2023-24 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 27 7 9 16 0.593
2022-23 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 25 6 4 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2022-23 · Skidmore
+82.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
48%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17370
Forward overall
#593
Forward born in 2001
#1455
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.