IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Koblick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-09-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 38 4 10 14 0.368 0.0851 0.0914 0.1803 0.1937
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 34 1 18 19 0.559 0.1291 0.1315 0.2734 0.2785
2018-19 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 28 4 11 15 0.536 0.1237 0.1198 0.2621 0.2538
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC — 12 0 2 2 0.167
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC — 24 0 5 5 0.208
2020-21 Stevenson D1 MAC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8464
Defenseman overall
#1604
Defenseman born in 1998
#1062
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wyatt Trumbley
Westfield State · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Fylling
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Antonucci
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.