icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Cowichan Valley Capitals | BCHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Abitibi Eskimos | NOJHL | 19 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.526 | 0.0887 | 0.0927 | 0.2187 | 0.2285 |
| 2013-14 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Atlanta Kings | USPHL-Elite | 20 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.550 | 0.0659 | 0.0628 | 0.1263 | 0.1204 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | SR | 26 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.385 |
| 2017-18 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | JR | 23 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.217 |
| 2016-17 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 21 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.238 |
| 2015-16 | Westfield State | D3 | MASCAC | FR | 26 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.462 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.