← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Trumbley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-09-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Abitibi Eskimos NOJHL 19 3 7 10 0.526 0.0879 0.0918 0.2191 0.2289
2013-14 Penticton Vees BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 20 4 7 11 0.550 0.0508 0.0484 0.1260 0.1201
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Westfield State D1 MASCAC SR 26 2 8 10 0.385
2018-19 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 26 2 8 10 0.385
2017-18 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2016-17 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 21 2 3 5 0.238
2015-16 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 26 3 9 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2015-16 · Westfield State
+643.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19574
Defenseman overall
#2091
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.