IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Wiest Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-10-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Brooks Bandits AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2004-05 Surrey Eagles BCHL 49 4 4 8 0.163 0.0636 0.0665 0.2381 0.2491
2005-06 Surrey Eagles BCHL 58 7 14 21 0.466 0.1812 0.1805 0.6788 0.6761
2006-07 — BCHL 53 7 9 16 0.302 0.1175 0.1107 0.4403 0.4150
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — JR 22 0 4 4 0.182
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SO 17 0 2 2 0.118
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 11 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#32338
Forward overall
#1185
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeff Eppright
New England · 2016-17
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Blair Falotico
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Lokey
New England · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.