← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Eppright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHL 32 4 6 10 0.312 0.0722 0.0737 0.1529 0.1562
2016-17 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 40 6 10 16 0.400 0.1123 0.1097 0.3289 0.3213
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 University of New England D3 CNE 7 1 3 4 0.571
2020-21 University of New England D1 CNE SR 4 1 3 4 1.000
2020-21 University of New England D3 CNE SR 4 1 3 4 1.000
2019-20 University of New England D1 CNE JR 23 9 9 18 0.783
2019-20 University of New England D3 CNE JR 23 9 9 18 0.783
2018-19 University of New England D1 CNE SO 30 6 15 21 0.700
2018-19 University of New England D3 CNE SO 30 6 15 21 0.700
2017-18 University of New England D3 CNE FR 28 11 18 29 1.036
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2017-18 · University of New England
+1169.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44538
Forward overall
#2007
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2008-09
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.