IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Eppright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHL 32 4 6 10 0.312 0.0671 0.0685 0.1530 0.1563
2016-17 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 40 6 10 16 0.400 0.1201 0.1173 0.3295 0.3219
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 New England D3 — SR 4 1 3 4 1.000
2019-20 New England D3 — JR 23 9 9 18 0.783
2018-19 New England D3 — SO 30 6 15 21 0.700
2017-18 New England D3 — FR 28 11 18 29 1.036
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2017-18 · New England
+1137.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38561
Forward overall
#1759
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Becker
Bethel · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brodie Jamieson
Marian · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Turner
New England College · 2005-06
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.